<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=578173759778372&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Willingness-to-Pay for Hydrophilic Catheters

Fill out the form to read the full summary (PDF)

1246237-Health Economy 1 infographic for Social Media-HC


Cost Benefit Analysis of Intermittent Urinary Catheters

In the case with intermittent urinary catheters, differences in patient satisfaction and convenience aspects between different types of catheters cannot be evaluated with conventional methods (cost/QALY). Instead these value attributes can be investigated using a willingness-to-pay approach.

“Users prefer wet and ready- to-use catheters and they are more cost-effective than dry catheters”

The individuals in this study expressed a preference for both a wet and a ready-to-use catheter option compared to a dry catheter, and these catheter types are also more cost-effective than a dry catheter.

Please fill in the form to take part of the method, results and conclusion, and download your FREE printable PDF.